Re: Fixation and embedding of adult murine eyes
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Bill Sinai (Anatomical Pathology)" <Bills@icpmr.wsahs.nsw.gov.au> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 11:41:55 -0600 (CST)
From: Carolyn Pressman <cpress@gsbs3.gs.uth.tmc.edu>
Subject: Fixation and embedding of adult murine eyes
To: HistoNet Server <HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu>
Dear Carolyn,
Many many years ago I worked for a specialist eye pathologist, we
used formaldehyde which contained 1% cetavlon (a type of surface
tension reducer) I can see no reason why something like this (Tween)
would not do the same thing today. The fixation was for 24 hours
when we cut a small window in the orb, away from the critical area we
were examining and fixed for another 24 hours. I thought at the time
the fixation was excessive. We performed several trichrome type
stains with no apparent ill effects to the staining.
This may prove helpful.
Bill
________________________________________________________________
What is the best fixative to use for adult murine eyes? Does anyone
have any good protocals? I have found through trial and error that
fixing in neutral buffered formalin only works ok if I fix for 2
days. I embed in parafin and then section at 7 um. Most of the
architecture of the eye is intact, but the lens always tears or has
holes in it. Is there a way to get around this problem? Is
embedding in plastic a better way to do this? Carolyn Pressman
MD Anderson Cancer Center
University of Texas--Houston
Bill Sinai
Department Manager
Tissue Pathology
ICPMR Westmead Hospital
WESTMEAD NSW AUSTRALIA
Phone 61+2+9845 7774 Fax 61+2+9687 2330
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>