This reinforces my view that a "false negative" is always worse that a "false positive" although some pathlogists disagree.
With a "false negative" you do nothing and with a "false positive" you do something even if it is not necessary, you err in the "cautious side".
René J.
Kemlo Rogerson wrote:
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
|