What about programming the processor to go 48 hours in formalin, then set
the remainder of the time in 50 or 70% ETOH? It would require math skills
and starting the processor at a precise time, rather than doing a delay
start (at least with the processors I know about they don't have a 1st hold
and 2nd hold ability) but would there be a problem with that from a
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: [Histonet] Re: HER2 fixation time
I agree with Rich, and it's good to hear that some colleagues have
started their own mode of cross-validation.
If you choose to deviate from the upper fixation limit of 48 hours,
you will ONLY be at default if you do not have evidence (with
documentation) that raising the upper fixation limits to 72 or 96
hours has no detrimental effects on the results. The CAP will
eventually increase the upper limit to 72 (or hopefully 96) hours once
there is solid evidence that is ok to do so.
Rene's suggestion to put the instrument on delay is not a valid
solution. As long as the tissue is sitting in formalin in the
instrument while it's on delay, it's still being fixed. This issue was
discussed at the ASCO/CAP meeting.
Hadi Yaziji, M.D., Medical Director
Vitro Molecular Laboratories,
President, Ancillary Pathways
7000 SW 62nd Avenue, Suite Penthouse-C
Miami, FL 33143
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipients and may contain privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-
mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:57:05 -0500
From: "Richard Cartun"
Subject: Re: [Histonet] HER2neu Fixation times
To: "Ramona Turner" ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Personally, I would not initiate any drastic changes at this point.
Keep in mind that these are guidelines; however, you must validate
your testing if you are going to follow other fixation guidelines. I
think everyone knowledgeable with this issue knows that the problem is
with underfixation, not overfixation. I recently pulled tumor out of
formalin after 8 months of fixation and the IHC was still "3+" and the
FISH showed beautiful amplification (ratio of 10.0). I hope that once
the scientific evidence is evaluated, these guidelines will be
changed. Major expense is being incurred here unnecessarily. How is
your concordance between IHC and FISH for the detection of HER2? If
it's not broken, don't try to fix it. Our "ad-hoc" committee on IHC
standardization is meeting in Santa Barbara on Sunday and I hope this
issue will be discussed.
Richard W. Cartun, Ph.D.
Director, Immunopathology & Histology
Assistant Director, Anatomic Pathology
80 Seymour Street
Hartford, CT 06102
(860) 545-0174 Fax
Histonet mailing list
Histonet mailing list