RE: [Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections

From:"Patsy Ruegg"

I come from a Hematopathology background where thinner is better, but for
general purposes especially for IHC I cut 4 micron thick sections.  I find
that tissues thinner than 3 microns can stain very pale by IHC methods.
Patsy 


Patsy Ruegg, HT(ASCP)QIHC
IHCtech, LLC
Fitzsimmons BioScience Park
12635 Montview Blvd. Suite 216
Aurora, CO 80010
P-720-859-4060
F-720-859-4110
wk email pruegg@ihctech.net
web site www.ihctech.net
 

This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the Person(s)
('the intended recipient') to whom it was addressed. Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author. It may contain information that is
privileged & confidential within the meaning of applicable law. Accordingly
any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message, or
any of its contents, by any person other than the intended recipient may
constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited. If
you are NOT the intended recipient please contact the sender and dispose of
this e-mail as soon as possible.


-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Poteete,
Jacquie A.
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:50 AM
To: 'Rene J Buesa'; Harrison, Sandra C.; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections

We use 4 Ám for everything unless the pathologist wants a thinner section.
I haven't cut a thicker section in over 5 years.

Jacquie Poteete MT(ASCP)QIHC
Lead Technologist, IHC Laboratory
Saint Francis Hospital, Tulsa, OK
japoteete@saintfrancis.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rene J Buesa [mailto:rjbuesa@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:12 AM
To: Harrison, Sandra C.; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections


Sandy:
  A 5 Ám thichness is the general standard for most laboratories and we used
it, BUT
  (there is always a "but" isn't it) if we were targeting a nuclear epitone
we  tried a 
  little thicker (6-7 Ám) and for cytoplasmic ones we tried somewhat thinner
(ca. 4 Ám).
  This approach was also used for histochemistry procedures: at least 6-7 Ám
for
  reticulum staining in bone marrows.
  I hope this will help you!
  RenÚ J.

"Harrison, Sandra C."  wrote:
  Hi Histonetters,

Is 5 microns the norm for IHC sections? What is considered optimal?

Thanks,

Sandy

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
  




		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
 Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping 
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




********* Email Confidentiality Statement ********* 
Visit http://www.saintfrancis.com/emailconf.asp

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


<< Previous Message | Next Message >>