RE: [Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections

From:"Poteete, Jacquie A."

We use 4 Ám for everything unless the pathologist wants a thinner section.
I haven't cut a thicker section in over 5 years.

Jacquie Poteete MT(ASCP)QIHC
Lead Technologist, IHC Laboratory
Saint Francis Hospital, Tulsa, OK
japoteete@saintfrancis.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rene J Buesa [mailto:rjbuesa@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:12 AM
To: Harrison, Sandra C.; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections


Sandy:
  A 5 Ám thichness is the general standard for most laboratories and we used
it, BUT
  (there is always a "but" isn't it) if we were targeting a nuclear epitone
we  tried a 
  little thicker (6-7 Ám) and for cytoplasmic ones we tried somewhat thinner
(ca. 4 Ám).
  This approach was also used for histochemistry procedures: at least 6-7 Ám
for
  reticulum staining in bone marrows.
  I hope this will help you!
  RenÚ J.

"Harrison, Sandra C."  wrote:
  Hi Histonetters,

Is 5 microns the norm for IHC sections? What is considered optimal?

Thanks,

Sandy

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
  




		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
 Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping 
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




********* Email Confidentiality Statement ********* 
Visit http://www.saintfrancis.com/emailconf.asp

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


<< Previous Message | Next Message >>