[Histonet] RE: Histonet Digest, Vol 2, Issue 29 [Scanned By SOPHOS Anti-Virus]
Does anyone know of a relatively safe, commercially available substitute for
acid dichromate glassware cleaning solution? In our neuropathology lab we
prepare this solution in-house and it is used for general glassware cleaning
and especially for glassware used in silver staining methods. There are some
commercial reagents available in the US but I have yet to source one in the
UK. Any ideas?
Graham A McHardy
Pathology Dept
ARI
Aberdeen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-request@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [SMTP:histonet-request@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
> Sent: 21 January 2004 18:00
> To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Histonet Digest, Vol 2, Issue 29 [Scanned By SOPHOS
> Anti-Virus]
>
> Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
> histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> histonet-request@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> histonet-owner@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: apotosis marker in mice (Jackie.O'Connor@abbott.com)
> 2. Re: Working Saturdays (Gareth Davis)
> 3. Hep C (Luis Chiriboga)
> 4. RE: HT Certified vs. HT non-certified (Morken, Tim - Labvision)
> 5. Recutting Old GMA tissue blocks (Barbara Harris)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:25:43 -0600
> From: Jackie.O'Connor@abbott.com
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] apotosis marker in mice
> To: Susan Q Wells
> Cc: histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu,
> histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
> Message-ID:
>
>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I use Caspase-3 routinely for apoptosis. I use an antibody on zinc fixed
> paraffin embedded tissues, but there are some out there for FFPE.
> Much easier than TUNEL, and more specific.
>
>
>
>
> Susan Q Wells
> Sent by: histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> 01/21/2004 10:17 AM
>
>
> To: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
> cc:
> Subject: [Histonet] apotosis marker in mice
>
>
> Hello fellow histonetters - Does anyone have a straightforward
> protocol for an apotosis marker to use on frozen or paraffin mice
> sections.I used the TUNEL stain a number of years ago but I'm
> thinking there may be an antibody out there that works just as
> well?
> Thanks in advance for your time,
> Sue Wells HT(ASCP),QIHC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:28:28 -0800 (PST)
> From: Gareth Davis
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Working Saturdays
> To: "Weems, Joyce" , Histonet
>
> Message-ID: <20040121172828.37965.qmail@web13306.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> In our lab at PathGroup, the day shift takes turns to do Saturdays. In
> our case we only need one person, because don't do any special stains or
> IHC. We basically just cut and get slides ready to be done early Monday
> moring. But, the person who is scheduled to work on a Saturday gets the
> previous Monday (so that the time works).
> Good luck.
>
> Gareth Blaeuer Davis
> Histotechinican
> PathGroup
> Nashville, Tennessee
>
> "Weems, Joyce" wrote:
>
> An unofficial survey:
>
> How many hospitals are working Saturdays? And what is the case load of
> those
> that do?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Joyce
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice ** The information contained in this message may=20
> be privileged and is confidential information intended for the use of
> the addressee listed above. If you are neither the intended recipient
> nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> Thank you. Saint JosephâEUR(tm)s Health System, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:34:12 -0500
> From: Luis Chiriboga
> Subject: [Histonet] Hep C
> To: Histonet
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi All
> is anyone using/trying/ have an antibody for Hep C
> Thanks
> Luis
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:34:45 -0800
> From: "Morken, Tim - Labvision"
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] HT Certified vs. HT non-certified
> To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Message-ID:
>
> <0556BE8AC5551E4E8AF6BB9E42509BA2035762@usca0082k08.labvision.apogent.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Yes, the age old question. As usual, it depends......
>
> I worked with an uncertified histotech of over 15 years experience who
> could
> do the usual special stains well, and was an excellet cutter, but who
> could
> not seem to develop methods on his own, write any meaningful procedures or
> even read very well. Basically he was one of those with one year of
> experience repeated 15 times. Although he was not certified it was not
> for
> lack of trying - he tried five times and couldn't pass the written test
> (which goes along with the inability to develop procedures, I think, and
> he
> only attempted certification when others in the lab started a study
> group).
> But he had some skill so he was an asset to the lab as a general bench
> worker.
>
> I have also worked with formally-trained (ie, completed a course),
> certified, very interested, but who were simply mediocre and never
> advanced.
>
>
> Then there are those OJT trained techs who got certified by their own hard
> work and were absolutely excellent and advanced almost at will (Indeed, I
> recently interviewed a non-certified histotech of only two years of
> experience (and no formal histotech courses) who had accomplished more in
> that two years than most techs do in their entire careers!).
>
> So, it depends on the person. I tend to be concerned about a person who
> has
> worked in the field for 15 years and is not certified. That is due either
> to
> lack of interest, or lack of ability in some way. A person who has
> received
> the certificaiton has proven their basic skill AND at least some potential
> for personal advancement. After all, the test is a personal endeavor; the
> person has to do the lab work, the reading, and the test. You don't get
> certified just because you occupied a space in the lab for 15 years. And
> if
> the issue is trainability, probably the certified person is going to be
> more
> trainiable than someone who can't, or won't attempt to, get certified
>
> So I guess the short answer is to look into their past very carefully and
> see what they have been doing. Never base it simply on years (long or
> short)
> or certification alone.
>
> Tim Morken
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Histolady710@aol.com [mailto:Histolady710@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:13 PM
> To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] HT Certified vs. HT non-certified
>
>
> This is for histology managers ! I'm curious as to which HT you would
> hire
> -
> a non-certified with 15 years experience or a OJT HT (ASCP) with 2 years
> experience. Thanks. _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:39:48 -0600
> From: "Barbara Harris"
> Subject: [Histonet] Recutting Old GMA tissue blocks
> To:
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Need helpful tips,protocols,and experienced advise, on how to resoften
> or re-embed 12 year old GMA (Glycol Methacrylate)blocked tissues.I will
> be sectioning thin section for teaching purposes.Thanks in advance for
> any and all responses.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> End of Histonet Digest, Vol 2, Issue 29
> ***************************************
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>