|From:||"Morken, Tim" <email@example.com>|
Dig-labeled probes are certainly easier to work with and provide results
sooner. Radioactive-labels are generally considered more sensitive, but with
amplification techniques the dig-labeled probes can approach that
sensitivity. Depending on how difficult it is to locate your target, one or
the other may be best. For "high-throughput" I would imagine dig-labeled
probes would be the one of choice. That's what we use in our lab.
Tim Morken, BA, EMT(MSA), HTL(ASCP)
Infectious Disease Pathology Activity
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30333
From: Su-Hua Lee [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:24 PM
To: HistoNet Server
Hi! Fellow Histonetters:
I am new to this. I have a couple questions:
1) Does anybody know that for high-throughput (for industry) in
hybridization, do DIG-labelled probes work better than radioactive-labelled
2) For tumor samples, do DIG-labelled probes work better than
Thanks for helping.
Research Associate II
Incyte Genomics, Inc.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>