RE: OSHA's Ergonomics Standards

From:Michael Rice <MRICE@nbhd.org>

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv˙ntent-Type> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT: 8pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: 2px"> <DIV><FONT sizeWe are currently using the disc microtome from Leica, it is a totally new design pretty rad actually, and it was designed specifically to eliminate ergonomic problems, techs may take awhile to adjust to it take a look at it</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT sizemike rice</FONT><BR><BR>>>> "Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org> 01/26/01 06:49AM >>><BR>I know that the Microm Ergostar is very good. <BR>Joyce Weems<BR>Pathology Manager<BR>Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta<BR><BR><BR>    -----Original Message-----<BR>    From:    Richard Cartun [SMTP:Rcartun@harthosp.org]<BR>    Sent:    Thursday, January 25, 2001 6:39 PM<BR>    To:    Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu<BR>    Subject:    OSHA's Ergonomics Standards<BR><BR>    I was just discussing "OSHA's ergonomics standard: Tools to help you<BR>comply" with one of our Lab Directors.  How "automated" are the new<BR>automated microtomes that are now available?  Thanks!<BR><BR>    R. Cartun<BR>    <BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>