Re: Poly - L -vs- Amino Alco (++ Slides)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Robert Schoonhoven <rschoonh@sph.unc.edu> (by way of Marvin Hanna) |
To: | histonet@histosearch.com |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
APES for Immuno, Chrome Alum for many of the harsher histochemistries
RUSS ALLISON wrote:
>
> At the end of John Kiernan's authorative description of how different
> "section adhesives" work, he gives his own preference for chrome/-
> gelatin.
> As John suggests, there appears not to have been (or there does
> not appear to have been), a properly conducted, published study of
> the comparative merits of the 3/4 realistic contenders for "best"
> tissue adhesive.
>
> In the absence of such a study, and crude in the extreme (a fault
> of which I am too often accused), I start the opinion poll with the
> view that APES is a thousand times better for immuno. than is
> John's prefered chrome/gelatin.
>
> Now lets get that opinion poll rolling. Make your choice:
>
> 1. (Mayer's) egg albumin
> 2. chrome/ gelatin
> 3. polylysine
> 4. APES
> 5. Other - specify.
> Russ Allison,
> Dental School
> Cardiff
> Wales
--
best regards,
Bob
Robert Schoonhoven
Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis
Dept. of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
University of North Carolina
CB#7400
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Phone
office 919-966-6343
Lab 919-966-6140
Fax 919-966-6123
Don't go around saying the world owes you a living; the world owes you
nothing; it was here first.
Mark Twain [Samuel Langhornne Clemens] (1835-1910)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>