Even though the Histology List Server undoubtedly ties in any and all
matters that stem from a HISTOTECH'S environment, you are correct in keeping
discussions to a Histology-only nature.

If one took a closer look at the implications stemming from this issue, I
think this may be of great relevance to this forum.  Irregardless of
political and moral ideals, this conflict may prove to be a great study in
the laboratory.

What we should perhaps have Seona do is rephrase her opinions into impartial
and dispassionate case studies.  For example, she should talk about lets say
"depleted uranium, and its affects on respiratory, endocrine, lymphatic,
muscular, nervous etc systems???" or "abnormally high infant mortality rates
attributed to pathogens".

That might be clinical enough to discuss...of course as long as she abstains
from any substantial or consequential opinions, correct?  All I can say is
I'm glad we're not into heavy discussions on a virology forum, think of all
the wasted time speaking about Africans.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dawson, Glen [mailto:GDawson@Milw.Dynacare.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:57 AM
> To: Andrew Partain; histonet@pathology.swmed
> Subject: RE: Uncle Bens
>
>
>
> Andrew,
>
> Wanting histology related issues discussed on a HISTOLOGY LIST SERVER does
> not show a lack of moral fiber nor does it scream "I am not genuine!!!".
> Though I would love to weigh in on this issue (many would not
> agree with my
> stance I am sure), I think it is best to preserve this as a histology
> related topics only server and I will save my political tirade for a more
> appropriate server.
>
> Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Partain [mailto:apartain@technicalprofessionals.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:17 AM
> To: Roger Moretz; SeonaCherie Hansen; histonet@pathology.swmed
> Subject: Uncle Bens
>
>
> SeonaCherie,
>
> Being a part of this forum shouldn't absolve you from sharing your moral
> (not just political) insights.  After all, I think being human still takes
> priority over working in histology.
>
> After all, it's disingenuous to lay aside reasonable moral objections and
> "support the status quo."  The ramifications of your statements
> far outweigh
> and belittle any and all histology-related subjects.
>
> Thank you Seona...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Moretz [mailto:stamptrain@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:18 AM
> > To: SeonaCherie Hansen; histonet@pathology.swmed
> > Subject: Re: A bag of rice
> >
> >
> > Regardless of my political leaning, the Histonet is
> > _no_ place for this.  (And my daughter and son-in-law
> > are Mennonites.)
> >
> > Roger Moretz, Ph.D.
> > Dept of Toxicology
> > BI Pharmaceuticals
> > Ridgefield, CT
> >
> > --- SeonaCherie Hansen  wrote:
> > > I would like to share with all of you this story
> > > that appeared in our Sunday paper:
> > >
> > > There is a Mennonite Church in Boulder, Colorado
> > > that has started "A bag of rice" movement as an
> > > anti-war statement. This is how it works: Place 1/2
> > > cup uncooked rice in a zip-lock bag. Wrap it in a
> > > piece of paper on which you have written, "If your
> > > enemies are hungry, feed them. Romans 12:20. Please
> > > send this rice to the people of Iraq; do not attack
> > > them."
> > >
> > > Place the paper and the bag of rice in a padded
> > > mailing envelope and address it to President George
> > > Bush, White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
> > > Washington, DC 20500. The mailing will cost three 37
> > > cent stamps. Organizers hope the  White House
> > > mailroom will be piled high with hundreds of
> > > thousands of bags of rice as a statement from the
> > > American people against war with Iraq.
> > >
> > > SeonaCherie
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >
>