Re: wanted, if possible, Paragon stain
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
| From: | RSRICHMOND@aol.com |
| To: | histonet@pathology.swmed.edu |
| Reply-To: | |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
The Paragon stain evidently survived as a research tool. Its earlier history
is, shall we say, more colorful.
The cryostat was introduced about forty years ago for cutting frozen
sections, and replaced an older technology that involved cutting floating
sections and staining them with whatever blue dye was handy (I even saw blue
fountain pen ink used.) The Paragon stain was probably the best of the lot.
The old pathologists wouldn't change. My father never used a cryostat in his
life, and neither did his younger associate. The one I got for them wound up
being used as an ice cream freezer!
I always refused to learn the old "wet knife" technique - sections were about
12 mcm thick, folded, and densely stained. But the real problem I didn't want
to deal with was that those old guys called everything cancer on those
primitive frozen sections, and I had been taught in residency not to call
things cancer that weren't cancer. Few pathologists of my generation (I'm 60)
learned the old technique, though we were always under pressure to. The
younger guys have never heard of it, and a good thing it is.
Bob Richmond
Samurai Pathologist
Knoxville TN
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>