Apop/trichrome. A suggested control, etc.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet@histosearch.com |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
With regard to the use of a trichrome technique to stain
apoptotic nuclei and their fragments (apoptotic bodies),
it would be sensible to do the method on sections of at
least two different thicknesses and determine whether the
abundance of apparently apoptotic cells (as a percentage
of the total number of cells counted) changes with the
thickness of the section. If this percentage does not vary
with section thickness, the specificity of the technique
would be supported.
The reason for doing this control (or test) is that in
entirely normal tissues it is possible to see nuclei of
different colours in cells stained with certain mixtures
of anionic dyes. In the distant past it was thought that
this might indicate some functional differences or cyclic
activities of the cells. Then in 1955 L. Lison published
a paper called "Staining differences in cell nuclei" in
the Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 96: 227-237.
He stained sections of rat's liver at several thicknesses
from about 4 to 15 um with a mixture of aniline blue,
orange G and PTA (as used in Mallory's method, or similar).
In the thinnest sections all the nuclei were blue, and in
the thickest about 40% were blue and 60% orange. The
biggest jump in percentage was between thicknesses of 6 um
and 10 um.
Lison's deduction was that aniline blue anions could enter
and stain only those nuclei that had been cut through by
the microtome knife, and could not enter intact nuclei that
were contained within the thickness of the section. Orange G
(much more compact anions, and only about 1/4 the size of
aniline blue) was able to penetrate and stain whole, uncut
nuclei. Lison was one of the fathers of histochemistry. His
book "Histochimie Animale" (1st edn was 1936) is one of the
classics of the subject. Does anyone know if he's still
around? The last I heard was about 1980 when he was an
emeritus professor in Brazil - Sao Paulo, I think.
This suggestion is not a criticism of the method published
in December's J Histotechnol, which may well be a perfectly
valid stain for apoptotic bodies and nuclei. The printed
pictures certainly look convincing. It's just that the
penetration and retention of dyes applied from mixtures is
a complicated business, and is affected by section
thickness as well as by fixation and other pre-treatments
of the tissue. Apoptotic nuclei are small (pyknotic), and
apoptotic bodies are so tiny that quite a high proportion
will be entirely contained in a thin paraffin section.
It's worth remembering that the only certain way to see
apoptosis is by electron microscopy. Close LM examination
(any nuclear stain; most often a haemalum) is 2nd best.
The expensive methods - TUNEL and in situ nick translation -
are less certain (because they also stain the later
remains of cells that have died by necrosis), but they have
the advantage of not colouring normal nuclei or other
"background" objects. Such methods appeal to younger research
workers who have not studied histology, feel uncomfortable
with a microscope, and expect a computer to identify and count
everything under the objective. The remarks in this paragraph
apply to sections, not to cell cultures.
Two recent, good reviews of methods for detecting apoptosis are:
Willingham, MC 1999. J Histochem Cytochem 47 (9), 1101-1109.
Huppertz, B et 2 al 1999. Anat Embryol 200, 1-18.
John A. Kiernan,
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology,
The University of Western Ontario,
LONDON, Canada N6A 5C1
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>