formalin fumes/extraction

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From:Gayle Callis <uvsgc@msu.oscs.montana.edu> (by way of histonet)
To:histonet@histosearch.com
Reply-To:
Content-Type:text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Although I dislike  smelling or coming into contact with
formalin fumes, I have a distinct impression that what drives laboratories
hospitals, etc to eliminate contact with these fumes, is OSHA regulations
in the United States,(possibly other countries have government regulations?
Canada comes to mind, hope they respond).  The punishment
in USA, if one is caught in the fumetrap, is expensive, and you still need
to correct the situation, regardless of proven documentation on effects of
formalin.  Hence, the wrath of the govt may be worse than exposure to
the chemical?????.

Sooooooo -- we have fume hoods in our facility,
avoiding  OSHA anger and whoever else says no no. If an
institution wants to play games and ignore regulations, they will suffer
the consequences of a potential lawsuit from workers, past and present,
in years to come, and then pay millions!!!  This is also true of our
university chemistry labs, who now are updating to protect the students.
Whew, big bucks going out there, so I guess we comply or pay.

Many of us are in old buildings, without adequate financial or physical means
to correct the "fumey" problem, a major difficulty.  The only problem
I have is a fume hood that pulls the fumes into a filter without some
type of outside ventilation.  The filter is eventually saturated, must
be tested in someway, to KNOW when this happens, so that you do not end
up back in the fume smelling mode, still exposing lab workers.  A vicious
circle.

I vote for formalin fume control, 'cause I want to live to 200 and bug
my kids for years to come whether documentation is there or not on
effects of formalin exposure.

What a bah humbug message this is, yeeetch!

Gayle Callis







<< Previous Message | Next Message >>