Re: supravital staining
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Paul Millikin <millikin@mtco.com> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
RSRICHMOND@aol.com wrote:
>
> Paul Millikin in Peoria IL notes:
>
> >>Supravital staining means putting a small drop of blood on a stained slide
> and adding a coverslip, then waiting for a few minutes for the living white
> cells to take up the stain. ... I use slides dipped in 0.25-0.5% toluidine
> blue (in absolute ethanol) and then dried on end at 60 degrees C.<<
>
> In the early 1960's when I was a medical student at Washington University in
> St. Louis (now the home of the Coenorhabditis elegans genome!) the
> hematologists, under the direction of the formidable Virginia Minnich, used a
> supravital stain for peripheral blood, using neutral red and malachite green
> and apochromatic lenses and a fair amount of mystery and mumbo-jumbo. Their
> differential counts always differed from the Wright-Giemsa results, and of
> course (by definition) were always right. I've never heard of this technique
> again, and I have no idea of its details.
>
> Bob Richmond
> Samurai Pathologist
> Knoxville TN
Dear Bob,
I, too, was exposed to your neutral red/malachite green supravital stain
l-o-o-o-o-n-g ago, but in Michigan, during my residency. So long ago, in
fact, that I couldn't remember the malachite green, nor do I have ANY
idea what the stains looked like or what they were used for.
I DO believe that the difference in differential counts between
supravital and air-dried smears is probably a matter of distribution, In
neither case are the wbc uniformly distributed.
--
Paul
Paul Millikin
Peoria, IL
millikin@mtco.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>