These are different RE: [Histonet] Methylmethacrylate to LR White?
LR White is not the same glycol methacrylate although it does contain some
type of methacrylate resin.
It's chemical components are
80% polyhydroxy substituted bisphenol, a dimethacrylate resin
19.6% C12 methacrylate ester
Catalyst is 0.9% benzoyl peroxide
One difference is LR white, although low viscosity, can be used for
electron microscopy while glycol methacrylate is not advisable for EM, it
"gums" up the 'scope.
I was never successful at removing polymerized methyl methacrylate (MMA)
from internal portions of a bone. However, I did remove it from external
bone surfaces after a rapid polymerization took place. Bubbled MMA was
chipped and ground away first, then the remaining block was immersed into
pure methacrylate monomer. The methacrylate monomer acts as MMA's own
solvent. After the bubbly mess was gone from the outside, but not the
inside of the bone which was reembedded into MMA. MMA can be removed from
thin sections (3 to 5 um, maybe thicker) with other solvents, even the
monomer and 60C xylene was suggested by Neil Hand. Chloroform may not be
advisable due to its carcingenic nature.
Gayle Callis HTL, HT, MT(ASCP)
Research Histopathology Supervisor
Veterinary Molecular Biology
Montana State University
Bozeman MT 59717
At 09:18 AM 12/15/2006, you wrote:
>Methyl methacrylate can be removed with xylene, but glycol methacrylate can
>not ever be completely removed, I believe LR White is a glycol methacrylate.
>[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of matt
>Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 5:02 AM
>Subject: [Histonet] Methylmethacrylate to LR White?
>I need to remove the methacrylate surrounding some bone samples (I was
>told that a 50:50 solution of xylene and chloroform would do the trick).
>The problem is that I want to re-embed the samples in LR White once the
>methacrylate has been removed. Does anyone have any experience in this
>or knows if it is possible? I need to cut 10 micron thick cross-sections
>of mouse tibiae and these have failed to adequately infiltrate with
>methacrylate. With LR White being less viscous I was hoping that it
>would infiltrate better.
> The information contained in this e-mail (including any attachments) is
>confidential and is intended for the use of the addressee only. The
>opinions expressed within this e-mail (including any attachments) are
>the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of
>Roslin Institute (Edinburgh) ("the Institute") unless specifically
>stated by a sender who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the
>Histonet mailing list
>Histonet mailing list
Histonet mailing list
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>