RE: Sakura vs. Leica coverslippers
I have used the Sakura tape coverslipper and the leica CV 5000.
The tape machine is best suited for production labs. It is very fast, almost
trouble free. I never saw any tape lift-off in the 5 years I used it, but
maybe it doesn't' make a lot of difference anyway; in a production
environment the chances are that no one will ever look at the vast majority
of those slides again after sign-out.
We currently have two leica CV5000 machines. One is for solvent-based
mounting media and the other for aqueous mounting media. This is a very
complex machine and is very finicky. I never leave the room when it is
running my slides. The new model is less complex so maybe it is less finicky
- at least from what I saw at the NSH show.
The Sakura glass coverslipper seemed less complex as well, and has a small
From: Satterfield, Marirose
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:02 AM
Subject: Sakura vs. Leica coverslippers
I am a first time user of the Histonet. I have been told it is very useful
I have been looking into purchasing a automated coverslip. We have had
several demos in-house. We had found for ease of operation the Sakura was
most trouble free. Although when the Leica Reps came in they told us stories
of slides coverslipped with the tape as popping off and ruining the tissue.
They also told us that there was a large company that sued Sakura for having
to go back and recover all their slides. So I am interested in hearing all
sides of the story from people who have used either coverslipper.
Thanks in advance
Mercy Memorial Hospital
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>