LIS - Cerner Vs the rest etc
Before you even think about Triple G I would
suggest that you check out their ability to deliver service and
support.
If you want to look at a superior Lab System then
contact TrakHealth - their histo module is excellent. This lab system is now
installed in over 70 countries with major installations in Europe, Britian,
Middle East, South America, Asia and Australia.
Like Triple G it is an Australian product,
however, LabTrak is part of a fully integrated Hospital Information System
(MedTrak) - it has a large installed base.
Yes, we have it in our laboratory and we are very
happy with the histology module which includes a daybook etc.
telephone 61 2 93807111
Richard Powell
Lab Manager,
Royal Darwin Hospital
Australia
We currently
have Cerner - not Millennium. It was purchased in 96, partly
because of what
Millennium would do. Service and support have been so poor
we are choosing a
different vendor totally, now that this version of Cerner
is being sunsetted.
We are leaning toward Triple G.
Joyce Weems
Pathology Manager
Saint
Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
-----Original Message-----
From:
Tapper, Sheila [SMTP:STapper@slhduluth.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001
10:39 AM
To: Histonet (E-mail)
Subject: Cerner Millennium vs Meditech
computer systems
We are in the final struggle of deciding on a new
computer system.
The two
contenders are Meditech and Cerner
Millennium. Has anyone else
compared the
two systems, or recently
went live with either system. I am
wondering what
impressions you
may be willing to share. They both appear to be
good
systems, but
very different in their software, and approach
to
Anatomic
Pathology.
Thank you in advance,
Sheila
Tapper
St. Luke's Hospital
Duluth,
MN
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>