RE: Coverslips
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Gary W. Gill" <garywgill@email.msn.com> |
To: | "Brown Alexander" <AlexB@nayrshire.scot.nhs.uk>, "HistoNet" <HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu> |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Sun, 15 Aug 1999 19:02:03 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Again, No. 1-1/2 is best only under restrictive circumstances rarely
observed in practice. No. 1 thickness is best.
Gary W. Gill
-----Original Message-----
From: Brown Alexander [mailto:AlexB@nayrshire.scot.nhs.uk]
Sent: August 12, 1999 7:03 AM
To: HistoNet
Subject: Coverslips
We've always used 1-1/2 type coverslips, both for manual and
auto coverslipping. We've been using the Leica coverslipper for almost
two years with this size without any problems. We use 22 x 50 mm
coverslips from Shandon, but perhaps thickness is more of an issue if
you use smaller coverslips. They may not flex enough for a robotic
coverslipper.
Alex Brown
Crosshouse Hospital
Kilmarnock, Scotland.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>