Re: [Histonet] autostainers & TMA's

From:"Thom Jensen"

I would not recommend the Tape Transfer System for paraffin blocks.  The 
sections are not near the quality of regular micronomy (ribboning and using 
a water bath).  We have stained hundreds of TMA slides on our Dako and 
Vantana systems and have not had a problem with cores falling off.  If you 
use plus slides you should not have problems.  Just make sure the slides are 
dried well.

Thom Jensen

For information on problems with the Tape Sectioning Method go to:

>From: "Helen Fedor" 
>To: ,
>Subject: Re: [Histonet] autostainers & TMA's
>Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:53:25 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from ([]) by 
> with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 
>14 Aug 2006 06:57:20 -0700
>Received: from localhost ([] 
> with esmtp (Exim 4.34)id 1GCct0-0005Rb-7O; Mon, 14 Aug 
>2006 08:53:46 -0500
>Received: from [] ( 
> with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GCcsx-0005RU-1Lfor 
>; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:53:44 -0500
>Received: from ([])by 
>with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1GCcsv-0001tX-QCfor 
>; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:53:42 -0500
>Received: from (HELO 
>[]) by with 
>ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA;14 Aug 2006 09:53:37 -0400
>Received: from Jhmipri-MTA by cis27.hosts.jhmi.eduwith Novell_GroupWise; 
>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:53:36 -0400
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt0gGT/wSCJIQE3rHsi6SWysOVcgIhg9xfs=
>X-BrightmailFiltered: true
>X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
>X-IronPort-AV: i="4.08,121,1154923200"; d="scan'208"; 
>X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 References: 
>X-Scan-Signature: 9b45ccbbf9b6b65cb3d07f69825436b9
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: For the exchange of information pertaining to histotechnology 
>andrelated fields 
>X-Scan-Signature: 5ce762e8aa474ea7aaa37532c083de4e
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on
>X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none 
>autolearn=no version=2.64
>X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:14:41 -0500)
>X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Aug 2006 13:57:20.0410 (UTC) 
>Sorry, for the last sentence.
>It should be: We do not experience tissue loss with this method.
> >>> Garry Ashton  8/12/2006 8:38 AM >>>
>Dear histonetters
>I have 2 topics up for discussion.
>Firstly immunostainers.
>We are a small research lab and hence I'm interested in a machine that
>is totally flexible with regards to running several antibodies with 2
>different methods.
>Ideally an "open system" that will  also dewax & retrieve if possible.
>We've looked at dako and biogenix which are both open  systems and
>ventana and vision biosytems.
>Any comments on the above, or on any other systems available would be
>I know this subject ha been covered several times on the histonet, but
>an up to date view would be much appreciated.
>Secondly has anybody had any problems with regards to TMA sections
>falling off slides.
>We use 1mm cores and only put about 100 in each block, which are then
>cut and placed on APES coated slides.
>Sometimes up to 30% of the core may come off.
>I think next we'll try charged slides. Does anybody have any opinions
>ideas on this
>Many thanks in advance for any opinions.
>Garry Ashton
>This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
>person(s) ('the intended recipient') to whom it was addressed. Any views
>or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
>necessarily represent those of the Paterson Institute for Cancer
>Research or the University of Manchester. It may contain information
>that is privileged & confidential within the meaning of applicable law.
>Accordingly any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of
>this message, or any of its contents, by any person other than the
>intended recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and
>is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient please
>contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail as soon as possible.
>Histonet mailing list
>Histonet mailing list

Histonet mailing list

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>