--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_boundary
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary"


--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings everyone,
I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the=20
difference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry fo=
r=20
example) procedure.=A0 I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may expla=
in the=20
differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.=A0 The only=
=20
difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different counterstain.=
=A0 It's=20
just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it has to be Hales ....I=20
still know this nagging question continues to bug me.=A0 I wish I could just=
 be a=20
little clearer on this.=A0 It seems like the Mueller-Mowry would also stain=20=
for=20
renal carcinoma and the only difference being the name of the procedure, a=20
water rinse and counterstain difference.=A0 Why are doctors so adamant about=
 the=20
Hales when it comes to renal carcinoma?

Thanks so much,
Sincerely
Deb King, HT
Sacramento, CA=A0=20

--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings everyone,

I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the di=
fference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry for=20=
example) procedure.=A0 I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may expla=
in the differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.=A0 T=
he only difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different counters=
tain.=A0 It's just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it has to be Hales ....I still know this nagging question continues to bug me.=
=A0 I wish I could just be a little clearer on this.=A0 It seems like the Mu=
eller-Mowry would also stain for renal carcinoma and the only difference bei=
ng the name of the procedure, a water rinse and counterstain difference.=A0=20=
Why are doctors so adamant about the Hales when it comes to renal carcinoma?=




Thanks so much,

Sincerely

Deb King, HT

Sacramento, CA=A0 


--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary--

--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-path: 
From: WWmn916@aol.com
Full-name: WWmn916
Message-ID: <12d.2f6090d1.2c6faccc@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 11:50:36 EDT
Subject: Hale's Colloidal Iron
To: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary"
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6014


--part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Greetings everyone,
I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the 
difference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry for 
example) procedure.  I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may explain the 
differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.  The only 
difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different counterstain.  It's 
just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it has to be Hales ....I 
still know this nagging question continues to bug me.  I wish I could just be a 
little clearer on this.  It seems like the Mueller-Mowry would also stain for 
renal carcinoma and the only difference being the name of the procedure, a 
water rinse and counterstain difference.  Why are doctors so adamant about the 
Hales when it comes to renal carcinoma?

Thanks so much,
Sincerely
Deb King, HT
Sacramento, CA  

--part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings everyone,

I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the di=
fference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry for=20=
example) procedure.  I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may ex=
plain the differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.&n=
bsp; The only difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different co=
unterstain.  It's just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it=
 has to be Hales ....I still know this nagging question continues to=20=
bug me.  I wish I could just be a little clearer on this.  It seem=
s like the Mueller-Mowry would also stain for renal carcinoma and the only d=
ifference being the name of the procedure, a water rinse and counterstain di=
fference.  Why are doctors so adamant about the Hales when it comes to=20=
renal carcinoma?



Thanks so much,

Sincerely

Deb King, HT

Sacramento, CA  

--part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary--

--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_boundary--

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet