Re: Quality-right first time?
|From:||Louri Caldwell <firstname.lastname@example.org> (by way of histonet)|
I do have experience in both settings myself, actually, but only at one
human clinical hospital. The pathologists there were also great about
discussing cases/problems. I was fortunate to have the opportunity to learn
from them as well as having the experience I have had here with the vet
paths. I thought pretty much all docs would want to help their techs learn
in order to allow them to do a better job - but I guess some just don't have
or take the time. I guess I've just been lucky?
I'm really intersted to hear what others experiences have been- especially
since I have techs here that go into human clinical settings after
certification - I would hate to mislead them with my own good experience of
what that setting is like if that is not the norm. I'm so glad you asked -
it never dawned on me that it may be otherwise!
College of Veterinary Medicine
University of Georgia
>Subject: Re: Quality-right first time?
>Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
>Louri Caldwell writes:
> >>The pathologists here are great (thankfully) about discussing/showing
>slides to us when they find an interesting case or problem. It makes for a
>better relationship all the way around.<<
>I have some background in veterinary pathology, but none in the day-to-day
>practice of it. I would suppose that the stresses on histotechnologists
>supporting veterinary pathologists would be somewhat different from those
>affecting histotechnologists supporting surgical pathologists. Anybody have
>experience in both these areas?
Get your FREE d
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>