Re: DAB with Nickel procedure
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca> |
To: | cklein@mail.mdanderson.org |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 cklein@mail.mdanderson.org wrote:
> Does anyone have a quick and easy to use procedure for the DAB with nickel
> stain?
It's just as qiick and easy as the regular DAB method.
For thin sections you can combine the pre-icubation
and incubation steps. The pre-incubation is desirable
for thick sections or whole-mounts to allow the largest
molecules (DAB) to penetrate the tissue thoroughly and
be where they're needed when the enzyme's substrate
(hydrogen peroxide) comes along.
Pre-incubate sections for about 15 minutes at room
temperature in the following solution.
3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride: 25 mg
Water: about 2 ml.
Dissolve the DAB in the water, then make up to
50 ml with either a 0.1M phosphate buffer or a
0.05M TRIS buffer, pH 7.2 to 7.4.
(If you try to dissolve DAB directly in the
buffer, it goes cloudy at first, presumably
due to formation of the free base of DAB, and
can take 15 m or longer to dissolve completely.)
2% nickel ammonium sulphate, stock solution in
water (keeps for ever): 0.5 ml.
Add 0.5 ml of 1% hydrogen peroxide and mix well.
The enzymatic reaction is often complete in 5 min,
especially if you have pre-incubated with the
chromogen and buffer as recommended, but you may
need to wait for as long as 15 min.
Wash in water (3 X 1 min).
Continue as you wish (counterstain, dehydrate etc).
The reaction product is blue-black and is not extracted
by water, alcohols or xylene.
You can substitute 2.5% cobalt chloride for the nickel
salt, or use a stock solution containing both salts:
2.5% CoCl2.6H2O and 2% Ni(NH4)2(SO4)2.6H2O.
The most frequently cited reference for this method is
J.C.Adams 1981 J Histochem Cytochem 29:775. He wasn't the
first to do these methods, but he compared nickel with
cobalt enhancement and recommended using salts of both
metals. For what it's worth, I don't see much difference
whichever one (or 2) is used. With Ni, Co or both the
result is much more pleasing than weary old DAB-brown,
and there is greater sensitivity because of the darker
colour. Red or green counterstains give appropriate
contrast.
John A. Kiernan,
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology,
The University of Western Ontario,
LONDON, Canada N6A 5C1
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>