RE: Image Analysis

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From:"Philopena, Jennifer" <jennifer.philopena@canji.com>
To:"'Su, Phy-Huynh'" <psu@shctampa.usf.edu>, 'Histonet' <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Reply-To:
Content-Type:text/plain; charset=windows-1252

We have 3 inverted Nikon scopes model TE 2000and TE 200, and we have 2
upright scopes, one Optiphot and one Eclipse.  We love them.  They are
beautiful pieces of equipment, fantastic quality, and we get great customer
service.



Jennifer M. Philopena
Scientist 1
Canji, Inc.
3525 John Hopkins Court
San Diego, CA 92121
jennifer.philopena@canji.com

> ----------
> From: 	Su, Phy-Huynh
> Sent: 	Wednesday, August 16, 2000 12:54 PM
> To: 	'Histonet'
> Subject: 	Image Analysis
> 
> Dear Histonets,
> 
> Our reserach department is planning to buy a new microscope to use  for
> both
> fluorescence and light, coupled with good digital camera for fluorescence
> and light, and image analysis.  Our director only wants the best, and has
> till this Friday to get the quotes to write the grant to ask for the
> money.
> So far, ZEISS has given him a quote about $77K.  However, I have heard
> from
> a pathologist that she had a bad experience with ZEISS 4 years ago when
> buying her microscope, image analyzer, and suggested LEICA instead.
> 
> Would anyone have any other recommendations?  Any other satisfied
> customers
> in this field?  Not only good instruments to start with, but excellent,
> timely services down the road.
> 
> Please also provide contact numbers.
> 
> Thanks a bunch.
> 



<< Previous Message | Next Message >>