Re: carbon 14 labeled tissue
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca> |
To: | GSennello@nexstar.com |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Carbon 14 is a high-energy beta emitter, so you cannot expect high
resolution autoradiographs (for which you need low energy beta
particles as from tritium or internal conversion electrons as
from Iodine 125). If the isotope is in a drug, you need to know
that it will be immobilized by whatever fixative you use. If the
drug is not made insoluble or irreversibly bound to the tissue,
autoradiography will be a meaningless exercise because all the
radioactive material will be lost long before you cut any sections.
If there is uncertainty, you could place pieces of freshly killed
mouse on X-ray film in darkness for a day or two, and then develop.
Do controls with mice that had the non-radioactive drug to
exclude chemographic artifact. This will show if the compound
becomes concentrated in any particular organs, and could provide
the baseline for a study to show if the drug can be retained
in fixed and processed material, cryostat sections etc.
As for safety, you should consult your radiation protection
officer, from whom you should already have received authorization
and advice. Amounts of some isotopes less than a millicurie are not
recognized as above background, but there could be a hazard if the
compound containing the radioactive element is concentrated in
some particular organ.
John A. Kiernan,
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology,
The University of Western Ontario,
LONDON, Canada N6A 5C1
______________________________________________________
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 GSennello@nexstar.com wrote:
> I have been asked to do auto-radiography on 14 C labeled rat tissue. The
> animals are receiving a single oral dose of
> 250 uCi/kg labeled drug that will probably not be absorbed well (we are
> thinking it will end up it the gut). I will be looking at kidney, liver
> and bone. My questions are: (1) will the processor, the solutions and
> the waste sections be hot at this level? In the past someone here dosed
> at 1/5 this level and it was not detectable. (2) should I try film vs.
> emulsion, in the past nothing was seen with emulsion after 30 and 60 day
> exposures.
______________________________________________________
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>