specimens that are exempt from sending to surgical pathology
We are reviewing our policies regarding tissues from the OR that should be
sent to pathology and tissues that are exempt.
We have some orthopedic surgeons that feel strongly that a lot of their
specimens do not have to be sent to pathology. Some cardiac surgeons do not
believe that plaque should be sent, and so forth. I need some feedback on
this issue. I know alot of the tissues that are currently not being sent
would only have a gross exam however isn't it important to document the
removal of the tissue by giving it a gross description.
The Illinois Administrative Code gives a list of exempt tissues and the main
question comes from the following statement:
This is in the list of tissue that does not have to be submitted to
Bone, cartilage, normal skin and scar tissue that are coincidentally removed
during the course of cosmetic or corrective surgery.
This has generated discussion on what does conincidentally removed means. I
would appreciate your thoughts on this.
This E-Mail and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and
may be legally privileged and /or confidential. If you believe you received
this E-Mail in error, please forward it to email@example.com to notify us of
the error, then delete it; do not divulge, copy, forward or use the contents
in any way. Please be aware that any unauthorized use or disclosure of the
contents of this E-Mail may be unlawful.
Memorial Health System
701 N. First Street
Springfield, IL 62781-0001
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>