Re: CPT coding
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | MTBowers@aol.com |
To: | HornHazelV@exchange.ach.uams.edu, sheppard@wfubmc.edu, STapper@smdc.org |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
In a message dated 04/17/2000 9:52:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
HornHazelV@exchange.ach.uams.edu writes:
> Can you explain to me how this code could possibly have a professional
> component???
> Hazel
Code 88311 does indeed have a professional and technical component. See Medic
are RBRVS: The Physician's Guide, published by the AMA, ISBN 1-57947-028-9.
The professional component is generally regarded as the physicians component
or interpretation. I think this is a throw back to the old days when the
pathologist routinely determined 'end-point' of decalcification. These days,
as we all know, this is rarely done by the pathologist. Regardless it is
still done.
If you were to ask a young pathologist to determine the end-point by chemical
means he might very well have the look of a deer caught in the headlights.
In the current CPT under 'Pathology and Laboratory Guidelines' it states,
"Services in Pathology and Laboratory are provided by a physician or by
technologists under responsible supervision of a physician."
Next point. The first several pathologists I worked with could also sit down
at the microtome and cut their own slides. Things change.
Matt Bowers
Lab Manager
Visalia Path. Med. Grp.
126 S. Floral
Visalia, CA
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>